iQOO Neo 9 vs Xiaomi 18T
iQOO Neo 9 vs Xiaomi 18T is too close to call — 7.4 overall against 7.2. Xiaomi 18T has the smoother display — 165Hz against 144Hz.
One of these devices is still rumored — its specs are not official yet and may change before launch.
iQOO Neo 9: Specifications are still being confirmed — scores appear as data is verified.
Xiaomi 18T: Based on announced specs — scored in 4 categories.
iQOO Neo 9
7.4/ 10 — Good
$386≈ €345 · ≈ £288≈ converted at today's rate · Buy on Amazon
Full specs & detailsKey highlights
| Highlight | iQOO Neo 9 | Xiaomi 18T |
|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4 nm) | MediaTek Dimensity 8600 |
| Display | 6.78″ · OLED · 144 Hz | OLED · 165 Hz |
| Main camera | — | 200 MP |
| Battery | 5,160 mAh · 120W charging | — |
Which is better?
- iQOO Neo 9 vs Xiaomi 18T is too close to call — 7.4 overall against 7.2.
- Xiaomi 18T takes 1 of the 2 categories both phones are scored in.
- Xiaomi 18T has the smoother display — 165Hz against 144Hz.
Category scores
| Category | iQOO Neo 9 | Xiaomi 18T |
|---|---|---|
| Display | 7.8 | 8.4Better |
| Battery | 8.6 | — |
| Software | 6.0Tie | 6.3Tie |
| Audio | 5.6 | — |
| Performance | — | 6.4 |
| Camera | — | 7.6 |
Open the interactive comparisonRadar chart, winner highlights and a differences-only view.
Full specifications side by side
| Specification | iQOO Neo 9 | Xiaomi 18T |
|---|---|---|
| Launch | ||
| Launch status | Available | Rumored |
| Release date | 2023 | — |
| Platform | ||
| OS | Android | Android |
| OS version | Android 14 (OriginOS 4) | Android 17, HyperOS 4 |
| Chipset (as published) | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4 nm) | MediaTek Dimensity 8600 |
| CPU | Octa-core (1×3.2 GHz Cortex-X3 + 2×2.8 GHz Cortex-A715 + 2×2.8 GHz Cortex-A710 + 3×2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) | — |
| GPU | Adreno 740 | — |
| Display | ||
| Display size | 6.78″ | — |
| Resolution | 1,260 × 2,800 pixels | — |
| Panel type | OLED | OLED |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 165 Hz |
| Display protection | Gorilla Glass front | — |
| Xiaomi 18T wins narrowly on Display (7.8 vs 8.4) | ||
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,160 mAh | — |
| Wired charging | 120W | — |
| Body & build | ||
| Dimensions | 163.5 × 75.7 × 8 mm | — |
| Colours | Black, Blue, Red | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.3 | — |
| NFC | Yes | — |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG supported | USB Type-C 2.0 (reported) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | — |
| Audio | ||
| 3.5mm jack | No | — |
| Features | ||
| Sensors | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Proximity, Compass | — |
| Face unlock | Yes | — |
| Fingerprint | — | Ultrasonic (under-display) |
| Camera | ||
| Front cameras | 16 MP wide (f/2.5) | 32 MP |
| Rear cameras | — | 200 MP · 50 MP ultrawide · Samsung ISOCELL JN5 · 50 MP periscope |
| Additional specifications | ||
| Misc · Models | Various RAM/storage variants: 12/256, 16/256, 16/512, 16/1TB | 27022PT99I (Indian variant, as reported) |
Popular comparisons for iQOO Neo 9
- iQOO Neo 9 vs Infinix Smart 20eOverall scoreiQOO Neo 97.4Infinix Smart 20e5.3
- iQOO Neo 9 vs Coolpad Cool X WideOverall scoreiQOO Neo 97.4Coolpad Cool X Wide6.1
- iQOO Neo 9 vs vivo Y6kOverall scoreiQOO Neo 97.4vivo Y6k5.5
- iQOO Neo 9 vs Philips S7210Overall scoreiQOO Neo 97.4Philips S72106.5Better for Battery life
Popular comparisons for Xiaomi 18T
- Xiaomi 18T vs Xiaomi 18
- Xiaomi 18T vs Oppo Find N7Better for Gaming
- Xiaomi 18T vs Infinix Smart 20eOverall scoreXiaomi 18T7.2Infinix Smart 20e5.3
- Xiaomi 18T vs Coolpad Cool X WideOverall scoreXiaomi 18T7.2Coolpad Cool X Wide6.1Better for Gaming