BBK Vivo X80 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 128GB V2183A vs Samsung Galaxy A58
BBK Vivo X80 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 128GB V2183A vs Samsung Galaxy A58 — full specifications compared side by side. BBK Vivo X80 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 128GB V2183A charges faster — 80W wired against 45W.
One of these devices is still rumored — its specs are not official yet and may change before launch.
BBK Vivo X80 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 128GB V2183A: Specifications are still being confirmed — scores appear as data is verified.
Samsung Galaxy A58: Based on announced specs — scored in 2 categories.
BBK Vivo X80 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 128GB V2183A
$3,699≈ €3,296 · ≈ £2,748≈ converted at today's rate · Buy on Amazon
Full specs & detailsKey highlights
| Highlight | BBK Vivo X80 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 128GB V2183A | Samsung Galaxy A58 |
|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 9000 MT6983, 2022, 64 bit, octa-core, 8192 Kbyte L3, 4 nm, ARM Mali-G710 GPU | — |
| Display | 172.2″ · OLED | — |
| Main camera | — | 50 MP wide |
| Battery | 80W charging | 45W charging |
| RAM / Storage | 128GB | — |
Which is better?
- BBK Vivo X80 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 128GB V2183A charges faster — 80W wired against 45W.
Category scores
| Category | BBK Vivo X80 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 128GB V2183A | Samsung Galaxy A58 |
|---|---|---|
| Display | 5.6 | — |
| Software | 5.8 | — |
| Camera | — | 6.7 |
| Call Quality | — | 7.8 |
Open the interactive comparisonRadar chart, winner highlights and a differences-only view.
Reasons to consider
BBK Vivo X80 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 128GB V2183A
- Faster charging (80W vs 45W)
Full specifications side by side
| Specification | BBK Vivo X80 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 128GB V2183A | Samsung Galaxy A58 |
|---|---|---|
| Launch | ||
| Launch status | Available | Rumored |
| Release date | 2022 | — |
| Expected release window | — | Mar 2027 |
| Platform | ||
| OS | Android | — |
| OS version | Google Android 12 (S) | — |
| Chipset (as published) | MediaTek Dimensity 9000 MT6983, 2022, 64 bit, octa-core, 8192 Kbyte L3, 4 nm, ARM Mali-G710 GPU | — |
| CPU | 3050.0 MHz | — |
| GPU | ARM Mali-G710MP10 | — |
| Memory | ||
| Memory variants (RAM/storage) | 128 GB | — |
| Card slot | None | — |
| Display | ||
| Display size | 172.2″ | — |
| Resolution | 1,080 × 2,400 pixels | — |
| Panel type | OLED | — |
| Display protection | Yes | — |
| Battery | ||
| Wired charging | 80W | 45W |
| Body & build | ||
| Weight | 206 g | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.3 | — |
| USB | USB C reversible; USB charging , USB fast charging , USB Host , USB OTG 1.3 , USB OTG 2.0 , USB PD , USB PD 2.0 , USB PD 3.0 | — |
| Camera | ||
| Front cameras | 32 MP | 12 MP |
| Rear cameras | — | 50 MP wide · 12 MP ultrawide · 5 MP macro |
| Network | ||
| Network technologies | — | 5G |
| Additional specifications | ||
| Selfie Camera · Single | 32.0 MP | 12 MP |
Popular comparisons for BBK Vivo X80 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 128GB V2183A
- BBK Vivo X80 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 128GB V2183A vs Honor 700S
- BBK Vivo X80 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 128GB V2183A vs Philips S7210
- BBK Vivo X80 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 128GB V2183A vs Philips S7221
- BBK Vivo X80 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 128GB V2183A vs RugOne Xsnap 7 ProBetter for Display