BBK vivo iQOO Z3 5G Top Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB V2073A vs Motorola Moto One
BBK vivo iQOO Z3 5G Top Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB V2073A vs Motorola Moto One — full specifications compared side by side. BBK vivo iQOO Z3 5G Top Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB V2073A charges faster — 55W wired against 15W.
One of these devices is still rumored — its specs are not official yet and may change before launch.
BBK vivo iQOO Z3 5G Top Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB V2073A: Specifications are still being confirmed — scores appear as data is verified.
Motorola Moto One: Based on announced specs — scored in 2 categories.
BBK vivo iQOO Z3 5G Top Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB V2073A
Check price on Amazon.com · Amazon.de · Amazon.co.uk
Full specs & detailsKey highlights
| Highlight | BBK vivo iQOO Z3 5G Top Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB V2073A | Motorola Moto One |
|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 768G 5G SM7250-AC, 2020, 64 bit, octa-core, 7 nm, Qualcomm Adreno 620 GPU | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5 (SM8845) |
| Display | 167.1″ · IPS LCD | — |
| Battery | 55W charging | 15W charging |
| RAM / Storage | 256GB | — |
Which is better?
- Category by category it is split — 0 scored categories each, with 1 tied.
- BBK vivo iQOO Z3 5G Top Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB V2073A charges faster — 55W wired against 15W.
Category scores
| Category | BBK vivo iQOO Z3 5G Top Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB V2073A | Motorola Moto One |
|---|---|---|
| Display | 4.6 | — |
| Software | 5.8Tie | 6.0Tie |
| Performance | — | 7.5 |
Open the interactive comparisonRadar chart, winner highlights and a differences-only view.
Reasons to consider
BBK vivo iQOO Z3 5G Top Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB V2073A
- Faster charging (55W vs 15W)
Full specifications side by side
| Specification | BBK vivo iQOO Z3 5G Top Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB V2073A | Motorola Moto One |
|---|---|---|
| Launch | ||
| Launch status | Available | Rumored |
| Release date | 2021 | — |
| Platform | ||
| OS | Android | Android |
| OS version | Google Android 11 (R) | Android 16 |
| Chipset (as published) | Qualcomm Snapdragon 768G 5G SM7250-AC, 2020, 64 bit, octa-core, 7 nm, Qualcomm Adreno 620 GPU | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5 (SM8845) |
| CPU | 2800.0 MHz | — |
| GPU | Qualcomm Adreno 620 | Adreno 829 (per Geekbench reports) |
| Memory | ||
| Memory variants (RAM/storage) | 256 GB | 12 GB RAM |
| Display | ||
| Display size | 167.1″ | — |
| Resolution | 1,080 × 2,408 pixels | — |
| Panel type | IPS LCD | — |
| Display protection | Yes | — |
| Battery | ||
| Wired charging | 55W | 15W |
| Wireless charging | — | Yes |
| Body & build | ||
| Weight | 186 g | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.1 | — |
| USB | USB C reversible; USB charging , USB fast charging , USB Host , USB OTG 1.3 , USB OTG 2.0 , USB PD | — |
| Camera | ||
| Front cameras | 15.9 MP | — |
Popular comparisons for BBK vivo iQOO Z3 5G Top Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB V2073A
- BBK vivo iQOO Z3 5G Top Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB V2073A vs Philips S7210Better for Display
- BBK vivo iQOO Z3 5G Top Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB V2073A vs Philips S7221Better for Display
- BBK vivo iQOO Z3 5G Top Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB V2073A vs RugOne Xsnap 7 ProBetter for Display
- BBK vivo iQOO Z3 5G Top Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB V2073A vs Samsung Galaxy A58